Gary Marcus

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 56
3/21/2025, 11:29:00 PM
X
In reply to:
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
46d
@GaryMarcus @nathalieX70 don’t trust everything you read

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
46d
@KettlebellDan @nathalieX70 a peaceful European scientist was just denied entry for a *text message*

a Lebanese doctor from Brown University was deported for going to a funeral.

Read the news, Dan. these aren’t vandals.

This is fucked up.

https://www.france24.com/en/amer…
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
46d
@nathalieX70 @GaryMarcus Are these vandalizing or peaceful Europeans?
Nathalie Suteau
@nathalieX70
·
46d
@KettlebellDan @GaryMarcus I think you missed some steps Dan. Gary is correct to the point you won’t see a lot of people travelling to the US from Europe.
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
46d
@GaryMarcus I see that he said people vandalizing cars would be sent to jail--that makes sense to me. I would think that's a law already.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
46d
@KettlebellDan Read the news, Dan. Anyone can be arrested for anything now. Or even deported. They are threatening to deport US citizens to El Salvador, searching visitors’ phones at the airport, redefining terms like violence and terrorism, chasing political enemies, and ignoring court orders.

The statement questions the credibility of the U.S. administration's actions and statements, suggesting skepticism due to a lack of evidence. It engages in public discourse by addressing issues of government transparency and accountability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies distrust in the administration, which could be seen as promoting skepticism rather than harm.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, maintaining respect for others' privacy and dignity.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on skepticism and criticism. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of the administration but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the issue at hand. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech responsibly by questioning government actions, which is a legitimate use of the platform. [+1]