Gary Marcus

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 68
3/21/2025, 11:30:23 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
45d
@KettlebellDan @nathalieX70 The U.S. official “did not provide further details”. Don’t believe everything this administration says, especially when they give literally zero evidence.

it’s not the touché you think it is.

There are too many similar incidents all in the last week.
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
45d
@GaryMarcus @nathalieX70 don’t trust everything you read

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
45d
@KettlebellDan @nathalieX70 a peaceful European scientist was just denied entry for a *text message*

a Lebanese doctor from Brown University was deported for going to a funeral.

Read the news, Dan. these aren’t vandals.

This is fucked up.

https://www.france24.com/en/amer…
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
45d
@nathalieX70 @GaryMarcus Are these vandalizing or peaceful Europeans?
Nathalie Suteau
@nathalieX70
·
45d
@KettlebellDan @GaryMarcus I think you missed some steps Dan. Gary is correct to the point you won’t see a lot of people travelling to the US from Europe.
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
45d
@GaryMarcus I see that he said people vandalizing cars would be sent to jail--that makes sense to me. I would think that's a law already.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues related to freedom of speech, deportation, and government actions, which are significant public concerns. The tone is critical and suggests a pattern of behavior by authorities that the speaker believes is being overlooked by others in the conversation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of others for missing a pattern, which could be seen as dismissive.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding by highlighting a perceived pattern of behavior, but it does so in a way that may not foster empathy or compassion due to its critical tone. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue but ends with 'I can’t help you any further,' which could be seen as dismissive rather than constructive. [-1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by discussing the deportation as a free speech issue, but the dismissive tone may not fully align with responsible use of the platform.