Gary Marcus

The statement is part of a conversation that touches on historical and political issues, specifically referencing leaders like Xi and Putin, which suggests engagement with public discourse on safety and political regimes.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a negative view of Xi and Putin, which could be seen as provocative.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does involve public figures, which is generally acceptable in public discourse.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses a rhetorical question to imply criticism. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a rhetorical question that could be seen as dismissive rather than engaging in meaningful discussion. [-1]