Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 80
3/21/2025, 11:44:53 PM
X
In reply to:
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
45d
@GaryMarcus Who was the funeral for?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
45d
@KettlebellDan @nathalieX70 And you didn’t address that the Brown prof was deported for going to a funeral, which should be viewed as akin to exercise in free speech.

It’s all part of a pattern that you are missing. I can’t help you any further.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
45d
@KettlebellDan @nathalieX70 The U.S. official “did not provide further details”. Don’t believe everything this administration says, especially when they give literally zero evidence.

it’s not the touché you think it is.

There are too many similar incidents all in the last week.
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
45d
@GaryMarcus @nathalieX70 don’t trust everything you read

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
45d
@KettlebellDan @nathalieX70 a peaceful European scientist was just denied entry for a *text message*

a Lebanese doctor from Brown University was deported for going to a funeral.

Read the news, Dan. these aren’t vandals.

This is fucked up.

https://www.france24.com/en/amer…
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
45d
@nathalieX70 @GaryMarcus Are these vandalizing or peaceful Europeans?

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about free speech and government overreach in the context of deportation and entry denial incidents. It questions the justification of actions taken by authorities and highlights potential threats to civil liberties.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language but does not directly harm others. It expresses concern over potential harm to civil liberties.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It critiques government actions rather than individuals.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding of perceived threats to free speech, though it could be more empathetic in tone.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue and criticism of government actions but could be seen as dismissive of opposing views. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by questioning government actions and encouraging public discourse on civil liberties. [+1]