Gary Marcus

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 62
3/22/2025, 12:09:42 AM
X
In reply to:
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
29d
@GaryMarcus Thanks for the warning. I will be sure to avoid vandalizing private property, violating NDAs, and attending terrorist’s funerals just to play it safe.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
29d
@KettlebellDan 1. “Going to a funeral with” does not prove “someone was involved with.”
2. There was no due process, no trial, and no real crime alleged.
3. In the new regime, anything could be relabeled as terrorism.
So again kiss your civil rights goodbye and pray that your party never leaves
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
29d
@GaryMarcus I think being involved with a terrorist organization matters significantly
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
29d
@KettlebellDan Doesn’t matter.

If America suddenly think then President gets to decide whose funeral you can go to, we are already fucked.

Kiss free speech goodbye.

Speaking of which, was the suspension of Rick Wilson at all justified?
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
29d
@GaryMarcus Who was the funeral for?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
29d
@KettlebellDan @nathalieX70 And you didn’t address that the Brown prof was deported for going to a funeral, which should be viewed as akin to exercise in free speech.

It’s all part of a pattern that you are missing. I can’t help you any further.

The statement is part of a broader discussion on civil rights, free speech, and the implications of labeling actions as terrorism. It reflects concerns about arbitrary judgments and the potential misuse of power in defining terrorism, which are significant public issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement warns against flippant remarks that could lead to regret, suggesting a concern for the potential harm of words, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, maintaining respect for others' privacy and dignity. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement indirectly promotes understanding by highlighting the potential consequences of arbitrary judgments, though it could be more empathetic in tone.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue with someone in disagreement, but the tone is somewhat confrontational, which could be improved to avoid personal attacks. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by participating in a discussion about civil rights and the implications of labeling actions as terrorism, using the platform responsibly. [+1]