Gary Marcus

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 62
3/22/2025, 12:09:59 AM
X
In reply to:
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
29d
@GaryMarcus Thanks for the warning. I will be sure to avoid vandalizing private property, violating NDAs, and attending terrorist’s funerals just to play it safe.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
29d
@KettlebellDan 1. “Going to a funeral with” does not prove “someone was involved with.”
2. There was no due process, no trial, and no real crime alleged.
3. In the new regime, anything could be relabeled as terrorism.
So again kiss your civil rights goodbye and pray that your party never leaves
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
29d
@GaryMarcus I think being involved with a terrorist organization matters significantly
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
29d
@KettlebellDan Doesn’t matter.

If America suddenly think then President gets to decide whose funeral you can go to, we are already fucked.

Kiss free speech goodbye.

Speaking of which, was the suspension of Rick Wilson at all justified?
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
29d
@GaryMarcus Who was the funeral for?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
29d
@KettlebellDan @nathalieX70 And you didn’t address that the Brown prof was deported for going to a funeral, which should be viewed as akin to exercise in free speech.

It’s all part of a pattern that you are missing. I can’t help you any further.

The statement 'Honestly I have had enough Dan' is a personal expression of frustration directed at another user, KettlebellDan, within a broader conversation about civil rights, free speech, and the implications of attending a funeral linked to terrorism. The conversation involves public discourse as it touches on significant societal issues such as civil liberties and the potential overreach of governmental power.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses personal frustration, which is neutral in terms of harm.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does express personal frustration, which could be seen as dismissive.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it is a personal expression of frustration without addressing the substantive issues in the conversation. [-1]