Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement involves a public issue concerning national security and the actions of government officials. It challenges a denial by a public figure, suggesting a serious allegation about the mishandling of sensitive information.
- The statement could potentially cause harm if the allegation is unfounded, as it involves sensitive national security information. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy to some extent but involves public figures and a public issue, which may justify the discussion.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is accusatory without providing evidence. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a direct contradiction, which could be seen as a personal attack if not substantiated. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.