Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement involves a discussion about the potential actions of a journalist and the White House's response to a story, which touches on public issues related to media, transparency, and government communication. The tone suggests a concern about the release of information and its implications.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a potential risk if information is released.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the journalist's credibility.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on the potential consequences of releasing information. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it implies a threat rather than engaging with the content of the story. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement touches on free speech and responsible use of platforms, as it involves the potential release of information by a journalist.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.