Gary Marcus

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 82
3/25/2025, 10:55:41 PM
X
In reply to:
Machine Learning Street Talk
@MLStreetTalk
·
39d
@GaryMarcus @pretendsmarts @alg0Goddess You can do it iteratively, see this example - refine step by step. You can paste in a starter image and ask it to change a specific detail
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
39d
@pretendsmarts @MLStreetTalk @alg0Goddess would it be possible to share screenshots or a video of this process? what happens if you ask again with a fresh prompt?
Andy Wojcicki
@pretendsmarts
·
40d
@GaryMarcus @MLStreetTalk @alg0Goddess those are just variations of the same "original" version and attempts to edit the initial image, as your request to demote the horse from astronaut.

the prompt was pretty simple request for an image in a space suit + a horse carried on back.

You might be interested that
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
40d
@pretendsmarts @MLStreetTalk @alg0Goddess why do all the images look almost identical and what are the prompts?
Andy Wojcicki
@pretendsmarts
·
40d
@MLStreetTalk @GaryMarcus @alg0Goddess Here you go, the "correct" version.
Machine Learning Street Talk
@MLStreetTalk
·
40d
@GaryMarcus @alg0Goddess It's turned Gary into Scott Aaronson!!

The statement is part of a technical discussion about the capabilities of an image generation system. The tone is analytical and seeks clarification on the system's performance, specifically addressing whether the system can generate a desired image on the first attempt. The intent is to engage in a constructive critique of the technology's functionality.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and is focused on a technical critique. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by seeking clarification and further explanation. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks. [+1]