Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 82
3/25/2025, 11:20:06 PM
X
In reply to:
David Orban
@davidorban
·
40d
@GaryMarcus @ylecun I was glad that it understood the prompt, interpreted it as humorous. The fact that it needed a few tries to get it right is a pity. I'm not surprised that you are not impressed. Where is your goalpost now? :)
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
40d
@davidorban @ylecun seems less impressive when you the full thread.
David Orban
@davidorban
·
40d
@GaryMarcus @ylecun what do you think?
David Orban
@davidorban
·
40d
Success

The statement is part of a discussion about AI's ability to interpret prompts correctly. It maintains a focus on the original goal of proper interpretation, suggesting a commitment to consistency in evaluation. The tone is assertive but not confrontational, aiming to clarify the speaker's position.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and focuses on clarifying a point about AI interpretation. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by reiterating the original goal and engaging in a technical discussion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks, focusing on the topic at hand. [+1]