Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
DOD Rapid Response
@DODResponse
·
48d
The statement involves a public figure responding to an article, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is dismissive and critical, labeling the journalist as 'deceitful' and 'discredited.'
- The statement could be seen as harmful by using derogatory language, potentially damaging the journalist's reputation. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The language used does not respect the dignity of the journalist, bordering on personal attack. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks constructive criticism and engages in ad hominem attacks rather than addressing the content of the article. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.