Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement involves a discussion about how a particular individual ended up in a Signal chat, suggesting an element of surprise or suspicion. The tone is somewhat skeptical, and it hints at a possible conspiracy without making direct accusations.
- The statement does not directly harm anyone but implies suspicion, which could lead to misunderstanding. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy to some extent but discusses an individual's involvement in a chat, which could be seen as intrusive. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but suggests a conspiracy, which may not promote constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.