Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the performance of AI-focused investment funds compared to other sectors, suggesting a potential deflation of the AI investment bubble. It provides statistical data to support the claim and responds to a broader conversation about the sustainability of AI economics.
- The statement does not cause harm and presents factual data to support its claim, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By providing data, the statement promotes understanding of the current investment landscape, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a question about the AI bubble, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.