In reply to:
John's Outlook and Insight
@outlookninsight
·
86d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
86d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the use of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) as a tool for presidents to engage in military actions without explicit congressional approval. This is a substantive issue related to constitutional powers and military engagement.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a critique of policy rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in personal attacks or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting a potential misuse of legislative power, encouraging public awareness. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of policy, not individuals, and does not use ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about a significant public issue, contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly discussing a public policy issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.