Marianne Williamson

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 57
3/27/2025, 2:07:27 AM
X
In reply to:
Sirius
@Aykay76
·
86d
@marwilliamson @TwilightCougar1 Sorry Marianne but I strongly disagree with you. Your talking points are all over the fake media, just talking points with no evidence where else DOGE has all the RECEIPTS that point to unbelievable waste and fraud. You don't want to acknowledge because you have blind faith inDNC
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
86d
@TwilightCougar1 Absolutely yes. Any President, no matter what their party, might validly say at times that the government has become bloated and we need to pull back. Clinton did that. In fact, 450,000 people lost their jobs in a project called Reinventing Government. But it was a very
Pinky La Rouge
@TwilightCougar1
·
87d
@marwilliamson Marianne with all the love in my heart, can’t I ask you: doesn’t SOME of our government need dismantling? Don’t the people have the right to know when our money is being WASTED, funneled and corrupted? I have worked since I was 16 years old and am 63 and am feeling very
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
87d
Let’s do this.
Kat Abughazaleh
@abughazalehkat
·
88d
I'm Kat Abughazaleh and I'm running for Congress.

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing political trust and decision-making. It expresses skepticism towards the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and emphasizes personal research and decision-making. The tone is assertive and critical, focusing on individual judgment rather than blind allegiance.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but challenges the credibility of the DNC, which is a legitimate part of public discourse.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by encouraging personal research and decision-making, aligning with the principle of informed discourse. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the DNC's actions and promoting independent thought, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]