In reply to:
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
38d
The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages with the issue of influence and control over various societal institutions, suggesting a critique of perceived overreach or pressure exerted by certain entities. The tone is critical and implies a concern about the autonomy of these institutions.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it implies criticism of certain entities.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does name specific institutions, which could be seen as a form of public critique.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on critique rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not offer constructive criticism or dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about perceived issues in society, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by highlighting concerns. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing a critical opinion, but it should ensure that the critique is responsible and based on facts. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.