Michael Schellenberger

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -29
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
17d
One FBI employee involved in the cover-up of the Hunter Biden laptop was Bradley Benavides (ctr-intel div). Weeks earlier he played key role in an apparent FBI scheme to smear @SenRonJohnson & @ChuckGrassley — who were investigating Hunter — as tools of Putin. Sinister.
4/1/2025, 11:17:23 PM
X
In reply to:
Margot Cleveland
@ProfMJCleveland
·
17d
@C__Herridge @shellenberger Respectfully, I encourage you both to follow up on these two threads that I pulled but have been unable to unravel! You may have better luck in finding sources than me!
Margot Cleveland
@ProfMJCleveland
·
17d
THREADETTE: THIS. AND we still don't know 2 key points: WHAT prompted Aspen Institute to run "table top exercise" to "prebunk" story amazingly similar to reality. AND why was Baltimore FBI agent running keyword searches to flag disinformation for Twitter? /1
Catherine Herridge
@C__Herridge
·
17d
This is our first joint investigative project with @shellenberger

More to come….
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
17d
The FBI said it didn't interfere in the 2020 election, but it did. It tricked Twitter & Facebook into censoring the Hunter Biden laptop story. Now, newly released chat messages show the FBI issued a "gag order" after an employee accidentally confirmed the laptop's authenticity.

The statement 'We're making progress' is part of a broader discussion about an investigative project related to the FBI's alleged interference in the 2020 election and the Hunter Biden laptop story. The conversation involves public figures and addresses significant public issues, such as government transparency and media influence.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement itself is neutral and does not cause harm. It suggests progress in an investigation, which could be seen as a positive development in uncovering the truth. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by indicating progress in an investigation, which may contribute to public knowledge and awareness. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a simple acknowledgment of progress. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to inform the public about ongoing investigative efforts, which could contribute to societal betterment by promoting transparency. [+1]