Michael Schellenberger

Rank 33 of 47
|
Score -29
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
16d
One FBI employee involved in the cover-up of the Hunter Biden laptop was Bradley Benavides (ctr-intel div). Weeks earlier he played key role in an apparent FBI scheme to smear @SenRonJohnson & @ChuckGrassley — who were investigating Hunter — as tools of Putin. Sinister.
4/1/2025, 11:19:44 PM
X
In reply to:
Margot Cleveland
@ProfMJCleveland
·
16d
THREADETTE: THIS. AND we still don't know 2 key points: WHAT prompted Aspen Institute to run "table top exercise" to "prebunk" story amazingly similar to reality. AND why was Baltimore FBI agent running keyword searches to flag disinformation for Twitter? /1
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
16d
The Twitter Files revealed that the FBI ran a sophisticated info operation aimed at convincing journalists and social media companies that the Hunter Biden laptop, which it had possessed since 2019, was the result of a Russian "hack and leak" operation.

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing alleged misconduct by the FBI related to the Hunter Biden laptop and its impact on public perception and media coverage. It suggests a pattern of behavior by the FBI that could influence public trust in governmental institutions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement implies wrongdoing by the FBI, which could harm reputations without definitive evidence, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It questions the actions of specific individuals and institutions, which could be seen as disrespectful if not substantiated, potentially violating the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on accusations rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement lacks constructive criticism and could be seen as a personal attack on the FBI, potentially violating the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [-1]