Marianne Williamson

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 133
4/4/2025, 3:26:32 AM
X
In reply to:
enslaved1s
@enslaved1s
·
17d
@marwilliamson Where is your proof backing up your claim we will be paying that much more? Inflation will hit the rich finally. People like you.

Regular people like me will just contuine to buy nothing and we will survive just fine. Especially when we get high paying jobs
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
17d
@enslaved1s Look again. The issue is the inflation this will cause. The average American family will pay anywhere between $2500 to $5000 more in living expenses this year. That's hardly a problem for the rich. It will only be a problem for everyone else.
enslaved1s
@enslaved1s
·
17d
@marwilliamson Tariffs are a tax on the rich. Half of this country is living check to check. They don't own stocks. The wealthy should be redistribute their wealth. It's too bad it's not willingly.

I'm glad to see the cry suffer. They have done a shitty job running things.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
17d
He has traumatized so many people, creating panic about their money, their jobs, their very ability to survive.

A healthy country would have only one response to this: "How f---ing dare you." 2/2
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
17d
He is carelessly inflicting pain. The fact that anyone is okay with this - justifying it, being complacent about it or failing to care - is more dangerous than anything he is specifically doing. 1/2

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the economic impact of tariffs and questioning the feasibility of obtaining high-paying jobs in the context of these tariffs. It challenges the previous assertion about the economic benefits for regular people and provides a link to a news article for further information.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but questions the feasibility of obtaining high-paying jobs, which could be seen as dismissive of the previous user's optimism.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the tone could be perceived as condescending.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding by providing a link to a news article, but the tone may not foster empathy or compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue by questioning the previous user's claim, but the tone could be perceived as dismissive rather than constructive. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses the platform to engage in a public issue responsibly by providing a source for further information, but the tone could be more respectful. [+1]