In reply to:
Kerie Keffer
@KerieKeffer
·
16d
The statement is part of a conversation that involves a public figure, Marianne Williamson, discussing the actions of another individual who is allegedly causing harm. The reply by @KerieKeffer and the subsequent response by another user engage in a dialogue that touches on public issues, specifically the behavior of public figures and its impact on society. This constitutes public discourse as it involves engagement with societal concerns and public behavior.
- The statement by @KerieKeffer does not directly inflict harm but is dismissive, which could be seen as undermining the seriousness of the initial concern about inflicting pain. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the dismissive tone could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of the original concern. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather dismisses the previous comment without addressing the substance of the concern. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.