Marianne Williamson

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 130
4/4/2025, 8:34:22 PM
X
In reply to:
Hoodie James Harrison
@hoodieslvrback
·
14d
@marwilliamson ACIM says to “tell others that they are right” (in spirit, not verbally) & when a brother is acting insanely to “only see the sanity in them.” Yes a doctor can tell someone they have cancer, & we can have political perspectives, but this line - "How f---ing dare you." - is fear.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
14d
@hoodieslvrback What you’re quoting in a course in miracles is correct. But I do not interpret it as you do, if you think it means that exposing injustice is simply “peddling fear.” Is the oncologist telling someone that they have stage three cancer simply “peddling fear?” There are many lines
Hoodie James Harrison
@hoodieslvrback
·
15d
@marwilliamson And I would love to hear you explain “the secret to salvation is this: you are doing this to yourself” on this platform. “No matter what the form of attack!” To be influential politically, we must Return To Love. Not peddle fear.
Hoodie James Harrison
@hoodieslvrback
·
15d
@marwilliamson With all due respect, you are fostering level confusion by saying “He has traumatized so many people, creating panic about their money, jobs, their ability to survive” which suggests that physical experiences are our source of peace. ACIM tells us peace comes from spirit alone.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
15d
@hoodieslvrback That’s not an alternative; it’s simply describing the metaphysical truth behind it all. ACIM would say not to foster level confusion. Are you under the impression that being a student of the course of miracles means we have no capacity to set boundaries, or say no? There’s
Hoodie James Harrison
@hoodieslvrback
·
15d
@marwilliamson Alternatively, a healthy and sincere practitioner of A Course In Miracles would explain to all her followers that love holds no grievances and that the secret to salvation is that we all do this to ourselves.

The statement 'Ahh lol' is a lighthearted and non-substantive response to a complex discussion about the interpretation of 'A Course in Miracles' and its application to political discourse. The original conversation involves a debate on the balance between spiritual teachings and addressing real-world injustices, but the reply does not engage with these issues.