In reply to:
Beth Mouser
@Mudwelly_Beth
·
13d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
13d
Kerie Keffer
@KerieKeffer
·
13d
The statement is part of a broader conversation that touches on public figures and their actions, specifically referencing Donald Trump. The tone is inquisitive, seeking clarification on a previous statement about Trump being 'right about everything.' The intent seems to be to understand or challenge the assertion made by another user.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but seeks clarification, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By asking for clarification, the statement could promote understanding, though it does not explicitly express empathy or compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in dialogue without personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.