Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47

Score -112

The Court adds, "Although judicial review under the AEA is limited, we have held that an individual subject to detention and removal under that statute is entitled to ‘judicial review’ ... as well as whether he or she 'is in fact an alien enemy fourteen years of age or older.'"

4/8/2025, 12:24:24 AM

In reply to:

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

73d

Bravo to the Supreme Court for upholding the right of the accused under Alien Enemies Act to due process. "For all the rhetoric... today’s order & per curiam confirm... detainees... are entitled to... an opportunity to challenge their removal. The only question is which court..."

The statement discusses judicial review under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) and the entitlement of individuals to challenge their detention and removal. It highlights the importance of due process and judicial oversight, which are significant public issues.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement upholds the principle of doing no harm by advocating for judicial review and due process, ensuring fair treatment. [+2]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
It promotes understanding and empathy by emphasizing the rights of detainees to challenge their removal, fostering a sense of justice and fairness. [+2]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement uses its platform to highlight the importance of due process, contributing positively to societal discourse. [+2]