Michael Schellenberger

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -112
4/8/2025, 12:29:00 AM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
73d
The Court adds, "Although judicial review under the AEA is limited, we have held that an individual subject to detention and removal under that statute is entitled to ‘judicial review’ ... as well as whether he or she 'is in fact an alien enemy fourteen years of age or older.'"
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
73d
Bravo to the Supreme Court for upholding the right of the accused under Alien Enemies Act to due process. "For all the rhetoric... today’s order & per curiam confirm... detainees... are entitled to... an opportunity to challenge their removal. The only question is which court..."

The statement by Kavanagh and the conversation it replies to engage in public discourse by discussing judicial review and due process under the Alien Enemies Act. The tone is formal and analytical, focusing on legal interpretation and the rights of detainees.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by clarifying legal rights and processes, contributing to an informed public understanding. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by explaining the consensus on judicial review and the specific legal question at hand. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the legal issue without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]