Gary Marcus

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the potential for governmental overreach and the importance of checks and balances in the United States. It responds to concerns about freedom and governance, referencing a situation in China as a cautionary tale.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but dismisses concerns as 'fear mongering,' which could undermine serious discussion. [-1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement lacks empathy and understanding by dismissing concerns without engaging in constructive dialogue. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead uses a dismissive tone, which could hinder productive dialogue. [-1]