Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84

The statement uses humor and sarcasm to critique a public figure's definition of intelligence. It implies skepticism about the expertise of those making such claims, suggesting they are not qualified cognitive scientists.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses humor, which can be seen as a mild form of critique, but it does not appear to cause harm.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does mock a public figure.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The use of sarcasm does not promote understanding or empathy, but it does not significantly detract from it either.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in critique but does not attack the individual personally.