The statement and images discuss Harvard's decision not to comply with demands from the Trump administration regarding merit-based reforms. This touches on issues of academic freedom and governmental authority over private institutions.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as polarizing, depending on one's political stance.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding of Harvard's position on academic freedom and autonomy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather focuses on institutional actions. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to discuss the importance of institutional autonomy and academic freedom. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.