Gary Marcus

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of racial discrimination in university admissions, a topic of societal and political significance. The initial comment by @GaryMarcus praises Harvard's stance against government demands, while @aughtdev criticizes perceived liberal hypocrisy regarding racial discrimination. The reply questions the inference made by @aughtdev, suggesting a disagreement or misunderstanding.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement by @aughtdev could be seen as potentially harmful by implying hypocrisy without providing evidence, which may not fully align with striving to do no harm. [-1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it makes a broad generalization about liberals without fostering constructive dialogue. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement lacks constructive criticism and engages in a personal attack on a group, rather than addressing the issue with specific arguments. [-1]