In reply to:
Evan M
@evanM_FP
·
294d
The statement is defensive and confrontational, responding to perceived condescension with a warning of blocking. It lacks constructive engagement and escalates the tone of the conversation.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it escalates the conflict with a threat. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of others, using a confrontational tone. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- It fails to engage in constructive dialogue, opting for a personal warning instead. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.