Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
4/14/2025, 8:46:37 PM
X
In reply to:
sacluir
@sacluirr
·
294d
@GaryMarcus That doesn’t refute what he said. Actually, the reasoning models (o1,o3, etc) show that he’s correct. LLMs do get better, there’s always more to scale and new mountains to climb
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
294d
And yet still no gpt-5
Miles Brundage
@Miles_Brundage
·
294d
AI can get continue getting much more capable + much cheaper for longer than your dismissiveness can stay solvent

The statement is part of a conversation about the development and capabilities of AI models, specifically referencing GPT-5. It engages in a discussion about the progress and potential of AI technology, which is a public issue given the impact of AI on society.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm with words or actions. It is a neutral comment on the state of AI development.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to a broader discussion on AI development.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a factual observation rather than a critique. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a discussion on AI development. [+1]