In reply to:
BionicBev
@BeverlyBehlmann
·
23d
The statement 'Sitting. I can still think.' is a response in a conversation that involves a public issue, specifically the removal of certain books from the U.S. Naval Academy's shelves, which is a matter of public concern related to censorship and diversity. The tone of the statement is defiant and suggests a commitment to continue engaging in thought and discourse despite being told to 'sit down.'
- The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a broader conversation that could be seen as contentious.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes the idea of continued thought and engagement, which can be seen as promoting understanding and dialogue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather asserts the speaker's right to continue thinking and engaging. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by asserting the speaker's right to think and engage in discourse. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.