The statement 'Sitting. I can still think.' is a response in a conversation that involves a public issue, specifically the removal of certain books from the U.S. Naval Academy's shelves, which is a matter of public concern related to censorship and diversity. The tone of the statement is defiant and suggests a commitment to continue engaging in thought and discourse despite being told to 'sit down.'
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a broader conversation that could be seen as contentious.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement promotes the idea of continued thought and engagement, which can be seen as promoting understanding and dialogue.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather asserts the speaker's right to continue thinking and engaging.
[+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds free speech by asserting the speaker's right to think and engage in discourse.
[+1]