Marianne Williamson

Rank 9 of 47
|
Score 147
4/15/2025, 7:11:49 PM
X
In reply to:
Jeff Bachman
@J__Bachman
·
23d
@marwilliamson @Clausnitzercan Guarantee what you still have posted is inaccurate. It doesn't pass the smell test.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
23d
@Clausnitzercan Because I was apparently wrong. I read an article that said Mein Kampf had been on the shelves and they simply kept them there. So I deleted what turned out to be inaccurate information.
clausnitzer
@Clausnitzercan
·
23d
@marwilliamson Marianne deleted her previous post wherein she very specifically said, and emphasized, that they removed, “I Know Why The Cage Bird Sings,” and *added* to the shelves Mein Kampf. She really emphasized that they intentionally added Mein Kampf.

Why the change?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
23d
In keeping with Trump's DEI directives, the U.S. Naval Academy took all books about Blacks, Jews, or gays off the bookshelves (including "I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings").

But they kept MEIN KAMPF.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of book banning, which is a societal concern related to censorship and freedom of expression. The tone is assertive, suggesting that the claim about book banning is credible and widespread.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it could contribute to a heated debate on censorship.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does highlight a significant public issue.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the issue at hand. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, but it is part of a conversation where a previous participant corrected misinformation.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by discussing a public issue related to censorship and book banning. [+1]