In reply to:
Jeff Bachman
@J__Bachman
·
8d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
8d
clausnitzer
@Clausnitzercan
·
8d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of book banning, which is a societal concern related to censorship and freedom of expression. The tone is assertive, suggesting that the claim about book banning is credible and widespread.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it could contribute to a heated debate on censorship.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does highlight a significant public issue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the issue at hand. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, but it is part of a conversation where a previous participant corrected misinformation.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing a public issue related to censorship and book banning. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.