Marianne Williamson

Rank 9 of 47
|
Score 141
4/15/2025, 7:14:31 PM
X
In reply to:
clausnitzer
@Clausnitzercan
·
23d
@marwilliamson Marianne, Don’t you see how egregious that is? You and so many others almost want this administration to be Nazi’s. This allows you to focus on fallacy’s instead of actual policy.

Meanwhile countless thousands of people saw your post and are now further emboldened to go key a
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
23d
@Clausnitzercan Because I was apparently wrong. I read an article that said Mein Kampf had been on the shelves and they simply kept them there. So I deleted what turned out to be inaccurate information.
clausnitzer
@Clausnitzercan
·
23d
@marwilliamson Marianne deleted her previous post wherein she very specifically said, and emphasized, that they removed, “I Know Why The Cage Bird Sings,” and *added* to the shelves Mein Kampf. She really emphasized that they intentionally added Mein Kampf.

Why the change?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
23d
In keeping with Trump's DEI directives, the U.S. Naval Academy took all books about Blacks, Jews, or gays off the bookshelves (including "I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings").

But they kept MEIN KAMPF.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of book banning and the role of government in determining accessible literature, which are significant public concerns. The tone is assertive, aiming to clarify the role of the President in cultural matters.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on the issue at hand, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the role of government in cultural decisions, fostering a more informed discussion. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the issue without resorting to personal attacks, thus adhering to this principle. [+1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not directly acknowledge or correct a mistake, but it is part of a conversation where a previous mistake was acknowledged and corrected by another participant.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by responsibly discussing the implications of government involvement in literature access. [+1]