Gary Marcus

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 82
4/19/2025, 3:04:02 AM
X
In reply to:
Bhaktavaschal Samal
@BhaktaVee
·
15d
@GaryMarcus i still remember unless i am hallucinating.

it was May 2022 and a Substack essay

“Dear Elon Musk, here are five things…,”

@GaryMarcus Marcus set out five concrete, capability‑based tests for true AGI—
understanding movies,
reading novels,
cooking competently in any
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
15d
Who is moving the goalposts? In an essay called Dear Elon Musk, I laid out clear criteria for AGI in May 2022. At the time the Twitter community - and the people who invented the term — agreed the criteria were fair.

NONE of the tests I laid out have been solved.

The people
Haider.
@slow_developer
·
15d
sometimes, the term "AGI" feels pointless

WHY?

with the insane level of progress daily, it already seems like AGI has been achieved.

- it doesn’t have a clear definition
- we keep shifting the goalpost

so maybe what we're now calling AGI is actually ASI?

The statement and linked content engage in a substantive discussion about the expectations and criteria for artificial general intelligence (AGI), a significant public issue in the field of technology and ethics. The conversation involves multiple participants discussing the definition and progress of AGI, which contributes to the civic dialogue on technological advancements and their implications.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it is part of a technical and philosophical discussion about AGI. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement and linked content aim to promote understanding by discussing criteria for AGI, which can foster empathy and compassion by considering the implications of AGI on society. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by referencing previous discussions and criteria for AGI, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to responsibly discuss a significant technological issue. [+2]