Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 82

The statement is part of a broader conversation about the effectiveness and reach of social media platforms, specifically addressing concerns about shadowbanning and the impact on public discourse. The tone is reflective and somewhat critical, focusing on the perceived limitations of current social media algorithms.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm with words or actions, as it is a personal observation about social media reach.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on personal experience rather than fostering dialogue.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the issue of social media reach.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement does not explicitly use influence for societal betterment, as it is more of a personal grievance about reach.
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles by discussing the limitations of social media reach, but does not use the platform to engage in broader public discourse.