The statement and its context involve a discussion about the effectiveness and impact of generative AI models, which is a public issue related to technology and its societal implications. The tone is speculative and somewhat critical, focusing on the perceived limitations of AI technology.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but the speculative nature about being shadowbanned could contribute to misinformation if not substantiated.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on speculation and critique.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of critique regarding AI technology and its promises, but it does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to discuss a public issue, but the speculative nature about being shadowbanned could detract from responsible discourse. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.