Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement critiques a Supreme Court decision, suggesting distrust in the Trump administration. It engages in public discourse by addressing judicial actions and government trust.
- The statement does not directly harm but implies distrust, which could be seen as critical rather than harmful.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but questions the integrity of a public administration, which is a common aspect of political discourse.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement critiques a government action without personal attacks, focusing on institutional trust. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.