Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement critiques the administration's actions and suggests they influence the Supreme Court's decisions, implying a lack of trust. It engages in public discourse by addressing the impact of governmental behavior on judicial processes.
- The statement implies harm by suggesting the administration's actions negatively influence the judiciary, but it does not use harmful language. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on criticism without offering constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the administration but does not resort to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.