Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
71d
In reply to:
Logan Kilpatrick
@OfficialLoganK
·
71d
The statement by @OfficialLoganK engages in a discussion about the challenges and misconceptions in the field of AI, particularly in relation to educational benchmarks and AI development. It references a broader conversation about AI's limitations and progress, thus contributing to public discourse on technological advancements and their implications.
- The statement does not cause harm and maintains a neutral tone, focusing on a critique of educational benchmarks in AI. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement indirectly promotes understanding by highlighting a common misconception about AI development, though it could be more explicit in fostering empathy or compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a point of contention in AI development without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to discuss a relevant public issue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.