Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
4/21/2025, 1:55:56 PM
X
In reply to:
Carlos E. Perez
@IntuitMachine
·
75d
@GaryMarcus To think that Peter Navarro, the primary advisor for this, takes his advice from a fictional economist!
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
75d
Who knew that World War III would start as a trade war, started out of stupidity?
Brian Krassenstein
@krassenstein
·
75d
BREAKING: China has just issued a major warning to the world, that it will retaliate against countries that cooperate with the U.S. on Tariffs in ways that compromise Beijing’s interests.

“China firmly opposes any party reaching a deal at the expense of China’s interests. If

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages in a discussion about international trade policies and their implications, which are significant public issues. The tone of the statement is critical and dismissive, suggesting that the advice being criticized is not based on credible sources.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but the dismissive tone could contribute to a negative discourse environment.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does dismiss the credibility of another's advice without substantial evidence.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses the advice without providing a reasoned argument or evidence, and it borders on a personal attack by implying the advice is self-created and not credible. [-1]