Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
Brian Krassenstein
@krassenstein
·
75d
BREAKING: China has just issued a major warning to the world, that it will retaliate against countries that cooperate with the U.S. on Tariffs in ways that compromise Beijing’s interests.

“China firmly opposes any party reaching a deal at the expense of China’s interests. If
4/21/2025, 3:42:26 AM
X

The statement comments on the potential global impact of trade tensions, suggesting that they could escalate into a larger conflict akin to World War III. The tone is critical and somewhat hyperbolic, implying that the situation is driven by poor decision-making.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses hyperbolic language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by escalating fears or tensions. This violates the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses a provocative analogy that may not foster constructive dialogue. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses a dismissive tone ('started out of stupidity') that could be seen as a personal attack on decision-makers, rather than focusing on the issues. [-1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or constructive, given its hyperbolic and critical nature. [-1]