Michael Schellenberger

The statement questions the relationship between defending democracy and political censorship, suggesting that such censorship is excessive. It implies criticism of governmental actions that may suppress free speech, particularly in the context of journalism and political discourse.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement raises concerns about potential harm caused by censorship, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy and dignity by focusing on governmental actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of government actions, which can be constructive if it leads to dialogue, but lacks specific evidence or examples.
4. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   It uses influence to highlight issues of free speech and censorship, aiming to promote awareness. [+1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech by questioning censorship, but could benefit from more balanced evidence.