In reply to:
Eric Schmitt
@Eric_Schmitt
·
36d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
36d
The statement by @Eric_Schmitt engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about political censorship and its implications for democracy. It questions the balance between defending democracy and the potential authoritarian nature of censorship, suggesting a critical view of current practices.
- The statement raises concerns about potential harm caused by political censorship, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity by focusing on political actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by questioning the implications of censorship on democracy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism by questioning the actions of governments without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.