Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement discusses a serious and potentially alarming issue involving national security and public safety, which constitutes public discourse. It claims that directed energy weapon attacks have occurred on US soil and targeted US personnel abroad, citing a top neuroscientist and military advisor as sources. The tone is urgent and potentially sensational, which could influence public perception and concern.
- The statement could cause public concern or panic if not substantiated, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- If the claims are unverified or exaggerated, it may not respect the privacy and dignity of those involved, including the alleged victims. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it lacks context or solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism, as it presents claims without evidence or counterarguments. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.