In reply to:
Catherine Herridge
@C__Herridge
·
38d
The statement is a reaction to a report about potential directed energy weapon attacks, which is a significant public issue involving national security and public safety. The reply, expressed as an emoji, indicates surprise or concern but does not provide substantive engagement or analysis.
- The reply does not cause harm but lacks substantive engagement with the issue.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The reply does not promote understanding or empathy as it is a simple expression of surprise without further context.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.