The statement critiques the decision-making of politicians during the COVID-19 pandemic regarding school closures, suggesting they acted out of arrogance and cowardice despite having sufficient information to reopen schools. It challenges the narrative presented by the media and references a book by David Zweig.
- The statement aims to hold politicians accountable, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for better decision-making. However, it uses strong language ('arrogance & cowardice') that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the use of strong language could be seen as disrespectful to the dignity of the individuals involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism of political decisions but does so in a manner that could be perceived as a personal attack due to the language used. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.