In reply to:
Andrea Junker
@Strandjunker
·
5d
The statement is a reply to a conversation that touches on religious and ideological views, which can be considered a public issue. The original statement by @Strandjunker addresses perceptions of the Pope's liberalism and relates it to the teachings of Jesus, which is a substantive engagement with public discourse on religion and ideology. The reply 'Perfect' is an endorsement of the original statement, indicating agreement with the sentiment expressed.
- The reply 'Perfect' does not directly cause harm, but it endorses a statement that could be seen as provocative to those with differing views, potentially leading to divisive discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The endorsement of the original statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it aligns with a potentially divisive stance. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The reply does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, nor does it involve personal attacks, but it does not foster constructive discourse either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.