The statement expresses a critical opinion about Paramount in response to an article about the resignation of the '60 Minutes' chief. It suggests disapproval of the company's actions and implies support for the individual who resigned. The tone is emotional and critical, indicating a stance on a public issue related to media and corporate influence.
- The statement does not directly harm others but uses strong language ('shame on Paramount') to express disapproval, which could be seen as a minor violation of striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it lacks specific arguments or evidence and instead uses a general expression of disapproval, which is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint on a public issue, aligning with the principle of using one's platform responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.