The statement critiques the approach of scaling deep learning models to achieve human-level intelligence and suggests that researchers should acknowledge those who have previously voiced similar concerns, like Gary Marcus. The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, implying that current researchers are late to recognize a known issue.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly harm but uses a critical tone that could be seen as dismissive.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.It highlights the importance of acknowledging past contributions, promoting understanding of historical context in AI research.
[+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in criticism but could be seen as lacking constructive dialogue, as it implies researchers are merely repeating past insights without adding value.
[-1]