Gary Marcus

The statement critiques the use of resources in AI development, suggesting redundancy in findings. It references a conversation about AI scaling and intelligence, involving public figures in AI. The tone is somewhat sarcastic, implying inefficiency or lack of originality in current AI research.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly harm but implies criticism of resource use in AI, which could be seen as constructive.
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   It does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on critique. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   Engages in mild sarcasm but does not attack individuals personally.